Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Washtenaw

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults who Binge Drink

17.4%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (16.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (17.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.6%).
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

21.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 21.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 21.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (26.5), Washtenaw has a value of 21.2 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(26.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Washtenaw has a value of 21.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (21.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.2).
Prior Value
(21.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Annual Opioid Hospitalizations

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Annual Opioid Hospitalizations

24
Hospitalizations
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (24) is less and better than the previously measured value (49).
Prior Value
(49)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
20.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 20.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 20.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,797 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (25.8), Washtenaw has a value of 20.2 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(25.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.0), Washtenaw has a value of 20.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (20.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.2).
Prior Value
(20.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washtenaw Death Rate due to Opioid-Related Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
19.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 19.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (25.3), Washtenaw has a value of 19.2 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(25.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (19.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.1).
Prior Value
(16.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Misuse of Drugs

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Misuse of Drugs

5.1%
% of adults
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (5.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.4%).
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Opioid Prescriptions Dispensed

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Opioid Prescriptions Dispensed

381,526.3
Prescriptions per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (663,067.3), Washtenaw has a value of 381,526.3.
MI Value
(663,067.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (381,526.3) is greater  than the previously measured value (3,855.3).
Prior Value
(3,855.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens who Binge Drink: 9th, 11th Graders

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (11.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.2% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (6.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens who had at least One Alcoholic Drink in the Last Month: 9th, 11th Graders

10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (25.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(25.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (10.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens who Use Marijuana: 9th, 11th Graders

Current Value:
7.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (21.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(21.6% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Cancer

6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.5%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
21.5
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 21.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.6.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 61 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 21.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (20.2), Washtenaw has a value of 21.5 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(20.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), Washtenaw has a value of 21.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (21.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.7).
Prior Value
(20.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
139.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 139.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 168.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 177.6.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 139.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (160.6), Washtenaw has a value of 139.9 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(160.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Washtenaw has a value of 139.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (139.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (139.8).
Prior Value
(139.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

Current Value:
11.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.4), Washtenaw has a value of 11.5 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Washtenaw has a value of 11.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (11.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0).
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
29.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 29.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 29.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (40.6), Washtenaw has a value of 29.8 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Washtenaw has a value of 29.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (29.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.7).
Prior Value
(30.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
18.3
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 18.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (18.6), Washtenaw has a value of 18.3 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(18.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Washtenaw has a value of 18.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (18.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0).
Prior Value
(19.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Washtenaw All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw All Cancer Incidence Rate

428.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 428.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 430.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 456.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 428.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (438.2), Washtenaw has a value of 428.1 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(438.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Washtenaw has a value of 428.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (428.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (434.8).
Prior Value
(434.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

130.0
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 130.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 118.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 128.3.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 130.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (122.7), Washtenaw has a value of 130.0 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(122.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Washtenaw has a value of 130.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (130.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (132.9).
Prior Value
(132.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Cancer: Medicare Population

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (11.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
81.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 81.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 81.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 81.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Colon Cancer Screening

71.5%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 71.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 69.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 71.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 71.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Colon Cancer Screening

75.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (75.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(75.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (75.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (72.9%).
Prior Value
(72.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
78.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 78.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 78.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 78.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
29.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 29.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.1.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 29.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (35.6), Washtenaw has a value of 29.3 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Washtenaw has a value of 29.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (29.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.7).
Prior Value
(29.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
45.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 45.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 62.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 45.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (59.6), Washtenaw has a value of 45.0 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(59.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Washtenaw has a value of 45.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (45.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (45.8).
Prior Value
(45.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
73.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 73.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 69.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 73.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 73.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Washtenaw Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (49.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (50.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (47.0%).
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
11.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.1.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (11.8), Washtenaw has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Washtenaw has a value of 11.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (11.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.5).
Prior Value
(11.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Pap Test in Past 3 Years

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Pap Test in Past 3 Years

63.0%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (79.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 63.0% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(79.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (63.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (79.8%).
Prior Value
(79.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

128.0
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 128.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 97.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 114.3.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 128.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (112.1), Washtenaw has a value of 128.0 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(112.1)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Washtenaw has a value of 128.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (128.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (127.7).
Prior Value
(127.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Number of Children Under Age 6 Tested for Blood Lead Level

2,043
Number of Children (Under Age 6)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (2,043) is less and worse than the previously measured value (2,315).
Prior Value
(2,315)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Number of Children Under Age 6 with an Elevated Blood Lead Level

53
Number of Children (Under Age 6)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (53) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38).
Prior Value
(38)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Percent of Children Under Age 6 Tested for Blood Lead Level

9.7%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (15.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.7% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan state value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Percent of Children Under Age 6 Tested with an Elevated Blood Lead Level

2.6%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (3.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan state value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (2.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.6%).
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Clinical Care Ranking

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Clinical Care Ranking

2
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.

County: Washtenaw Health Behaviors Ranking

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Health Behaviors Ranking

1
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.

County: Washtenaw Morbidity Ranking

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Morbidity Ranking

17
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 17 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.

County: Washtenaw Mortality Ranking

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Mortality Ranking

5
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.

County: Washtenaw Physical Environment Ranking

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Physical Environment Ranking

38
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 38 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.

County: Washtenaw Social and Economic Factors Ranking

Current Value:
5
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Diabetes

9.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (11.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
10.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 10.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.5.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (26.1), Washtenaw has a value of 10.3 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(26.1)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Washtenaw has a value of 10.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (10.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.5).
Prior Value
(11.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Diabetes: Medicare Population

20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (25.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (20.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

Current Value:
85.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 85.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 85.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (88.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 85.2% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 85.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (85.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.8%).
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
22.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 22.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 22.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (26.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 22.3% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 22.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Children with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Children with a Disability

4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (4.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.1%.
MI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.1%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.6%.
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.6%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Persons with a Disability

10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (14.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.1%.
MI Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.1%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (3.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 2.6%.
MI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 2.6%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (2.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 1.7%.
MI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 1.7%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (2.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 1.3%.
MI Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 1.3%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (7.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.5%.
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

3.5
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (11.5), Washtenaw has a value of 3.5 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Washtenaw has a value of 3.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (3.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.6).
Prior Value
(3.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teen Pregnancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Teen Pregnancy Rate

9.0
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.9.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (21.2), Washtenaw has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(21.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.8).
Prior Value
(7.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)

County: Washtenaw Teens who are Sexually Active: 9th, 11th Graders

Current Value:
15.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (24.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 15.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (15.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate: Medicare Population

14.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (15.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.9% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
69.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (77.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 69.8% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (69.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (72.1%).
Prior Value
(72.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care

Current Value:
88.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (87.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 88.7% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(87.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 88.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (88.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (88.2%).
Prior Value
(88.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Health Insurance

95.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 95.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (93.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 95.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (95.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (95.0%).
Prior Value
(95.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
5.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Children with Health Insurance

98.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 98.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (97.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 98.3% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(97.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 98.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (98.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (97.3%).
Prior Value
(97.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Medicare Healthcare Costs

$9,338
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value ($10,317), Washtenaw has a value of $9,338.
MI Value
($10,317)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Washtenaw has a value of $9,338.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw ($9,338) is greater  than the previously measured value ($9,156).
Prior Value
($9,156)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
343
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 343 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 95 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 343 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (132), Washtenaw has a value of 343 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(132)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (343) is less and worse than the previously measured value (356).
Prior Value
(356)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Persons with Health Insurance

94.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (94.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 94.9% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (94.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (94.9%).
Prior Value
(94.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washtenaw Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
67.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (54.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 67.1%.
MI Value
(54.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 67.1%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (67.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (67.4%).
Prior Value
(67.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
15.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (25.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 15.7%.
MI Value
(25.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 15.7%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (15.7%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.3%).
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
2,909.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2,909.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,449.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,880.0.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2,909.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (3,261.0), Washtenaw has a value of 2,909.0 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(3,261.0)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Washtenaw has a value of 2,909.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (2,909.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,043.0).
Prior Value
(3,043.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Primary Care Provider Rate

176
Providers per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 176 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 176 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 30.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,995 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (81), Washtenaw has a value of 176 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(81)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (176) is less and worse than the previously measured value (177).
Prior Value
(177)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
93.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 93.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.1%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 93.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (88.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 93.1% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(88.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 93.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

97.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 97.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.5%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 97.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (93.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 97.2% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 97.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
94.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (90.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 94.7% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(90.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 94.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
2.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
4.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Adults who Have been Told They Had a Heart Attack

Current Value:
2.6%
% of adults
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (2.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.5%).
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

75.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 75.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 75.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 75.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

39.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 39.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.1.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (44.7), Washtenaw has a value of 39.7 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(44.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Washtenaw has a value of 39.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (39.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (40.6).
Prior Value
(40.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
46.5
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 46.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.0.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (48.3), Washtenaw has a value of 46.5 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(48.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (46.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (43.7).
Prior Value
(43.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease

Current Value:
152.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 152.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 201.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 229.8.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (205.9), Washtenaw has a value of 152.5 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(205.9)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (152.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (157.9).
Prior Value
(157.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

39.5
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2014)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 39.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (37.4), Washtenaw has a value of 39.5 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(37.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (39.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (40.1).
Prior Value
(40.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (15.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Cholesterol Test History

84.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 84.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 84.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 84.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw High Blood Pressure Prevalence

23.1%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (35.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (23.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.7%).
Prior Value
(23.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Washtenaw High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
29.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 29.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 29.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 29.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (62.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 52.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 52.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (52.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (50.0%).
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
57.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (66.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 57.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 57.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (57.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (56.0%).
Prior Value
(56.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (22.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (17.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Stroke: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination

Current Value:
80.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (72.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 80.3% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 80.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (80.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (76.6%).
Prior Value
(76.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

Current Value:
75.6%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (72.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 75.6% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(72.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 75.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.6% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (75.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (75.9%).
Prior Value
(75.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

6.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.5.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (11.9), Washtenaw has a value of 6.7 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Washtenaw has a value of 6.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (6.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.1).
Prior Value
(7.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.4
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 0.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 0.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (3.7), Washtenaw has a value of 0.4 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(3.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Washtenaw has a value of 0.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (0.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (0.8).
Prior Value
(0.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
8.71
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.71 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.40 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.21.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.71 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (10.52), Washtenaw has a value of 8.71 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(10.52)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Washtenaw has a value of 8.71 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.71) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.52).
Prior Value
(9.52)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
54.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 54.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 54.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (47.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (54.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Immunization Status of 19 to 35-Month-Old Children

Current Value:
70.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 70.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 67.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (66.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 70.8% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(66.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (70.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.9%).
Prior Value
(71.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases

24
# of individuals
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (24) is greater  than the previously measured value (15).
Prior Value
(15)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
74.3%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (74.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (74.3%).
Prior Value
(74.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Washtenaw County Pertussis Data

Current Value:
2
Number of Pertussis Cases
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Babies with Low Birthweight

7.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (9.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.1%).
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Infant Mortality Rate

5.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.5), Washtenaw has a value of 5.7 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.5), Washtenaw has a value of 5.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.5 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (5.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6).
Prior Value
(5.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washtenaw Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:
80.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 80.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (76.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 80.9% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 80.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (80.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (78.2%).
Prior Value
(78.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy

Current Value:
4.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (8.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.6%.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (4.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.4%).
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)

County: Washtenaw Mothers who Were a Healthy Weight Before Pregnancy

Current Value:
47.5%
% of women
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (39.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 47.5% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(39.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (47.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (50.0%).
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2020 Target (57.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2020 Target
(57.8%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (47.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(47.1%)

County: Washtenaw Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Preterm Births

8.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.6%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (10.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.3%).
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

County: Washtenaw WIC Enrollment Data

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw WIC Enrollment Data

5,093
Persons
(July 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (5,093) is greater  than the previously measured value (4,975).
Prior Value
(4,975)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw WIC Redemptions Per Capita

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw WIC Redemptions Per Capita

$7.3
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw ($7.3) is less and worse than the previously measured value ($8.5).
Prior Value
($8.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
26.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 26.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
11.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.7.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 61 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (14.4), Washtenaw has a value of 11.2 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(14.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5), Washtenaw has a value of 11.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (11.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.4).
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washtenaw Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (18.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Mental Health Provider Rate

652
Providers per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 652 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 189 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 131.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 652 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 131 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 58.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,941 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (317), Washtenaw has a value of 652 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(317)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (652) is greater and better than the previously measured value (616).
Prior Value
(616)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

15.5%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (16.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (15.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.2%).
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Suicide Completions

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Suicide Completions

44
Number of completions
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (44) is less and better than the previously measured value (47).
Prior Value
(47)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens who Felt Sad or Hopeless Every Day for the Past 2 Weeks; 9th, 11th Graders

37.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (36.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(36.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (37.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.5%).
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Life Expectancy

80.9
Years
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 80.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 80.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 76.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,072 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (77.5), Washtenaw has a value of 80.9 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(77.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.5), Washtenaw has a value of 80.9 which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (80.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (81.4).
Prior Value
(81.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Premature Death

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Premature Death

5,265.5
Years per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5,265.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7,932.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8,858.8.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5,265.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8,624.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10,565.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,865 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7,883.4), Washtenaw has a value of 5,265.5 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(7,883.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7,300.0), Washtenaw has a value of 5,265.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7,300.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (5,265.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5,019.1).
Prior Value
(5,019.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
16.6%
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (14.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.6% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (16.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.4%).
Prior Value
(22.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Adults who Eat Fast Food More Than Once per Week

Current Value:
14.6%
% of adults
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.9%).
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Child Low Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
16.0%
%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (16.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Children who Drink No Sweetened Beverages

Current Value:
82.6%
% of children
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (82.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.4%).
Prior Value
(68.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Teens who Ate Five or More Servings of Fruits and Vegetables: 9th, 11th Graders

23.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (23.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (29.5%).
Prior Value
(29.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens who Drank Soda or Pop in the Last Week: 9th, 11th Graders

9.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (14.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(14.2% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

44.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 44.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 39.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.1%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 44.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 44.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

51.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 51.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 43.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 51.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 51.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Disability

27.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (32.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 27.9%.
MI Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 27.9%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
11.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (13.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.6%.
MI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.6%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.5%.
MI Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (5.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.3%.
MI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.3%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
10.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.6%.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.6%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Current Value:
38.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 38.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.7.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 79 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (34.4), Washtenaw has a value of 38.4 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Washtenaw has a value of 38.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (38.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.2).
Prior Value
(38.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0%.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
6.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.1%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults who Visited a Dentist

72.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 72.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 64.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 72.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 72.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Children Enrolled in Medicaid who Visited the Dentist the Past Year

49.1%
%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (49.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (48.8%).
Prior Value
(48.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the State of Michigan Target (70%), the target has not been met.
State of Michigan Target
(70%)
<div>This target is set forth by the State of Michigan. </div>

County: Washtenaw Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Dentist Rate

198
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 198 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 56 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 198 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,056 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (79), Washtenaw has a value of 198 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(79)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (198) is greater and better than the previously measured value (190).
Prior Value
(190)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Medicaid Enrollees who Visited the Dentist in the Last Year

27.0%
%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (27.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (28.1%).
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Women 18-44 Years Enrolled in Medicaid who Visited the Dentist in the Past year

21.2%
%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (21.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (22.6%).
Prior Value
(22.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Arthritis

23.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (30.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 23.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (23.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.7%).
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Kidney Disease

2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 2.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (19.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (17.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (10.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

32.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (36.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (32.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults who are Sedentary

14.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (22.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

County: Washtenaw Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity: 9th, 11th Graders

63.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (44.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 63.4% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(44.7% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (63.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (59.2%).
Prior Value
(59.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
6.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.0), Washtenaw has a value of 6.5 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Washtenaw has a value of 6.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (6.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0).
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

49.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 49.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 60.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.7.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (58.9), Washtenaw has a value of 49.7 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(58.9)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Washtenaw has a value of 49.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (49.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (47.3).
Prior Value
(47.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Washtenaw

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults with COPD

5.0%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults with Current Asthma

12.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (11.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (12.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

23.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 23.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 49.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 56.3.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 80 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (39.9), Washtenaw has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(39.9)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4), Washtenaw has a value of 23.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (23.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.9).
Prior Value
(24.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Asthma: Medicare Population

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0%.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.