Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Social Determinants of Health Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Washtenaw

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Social and Economic Factors Ranking

Current Value:
5
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Violent Crime Rate

303.1
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 303.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 263.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 331.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (443.2), Washtenaw has a value of 303.1 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(443.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (386.5), Washtenaw has a value of 303.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(386.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (303.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (298.9).
Prior Value
(298.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Social Associations

9.9
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 8.9.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (9.5), Washtenaw has a value of 9.9 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(9.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Washtenaw has a value of 9.9 which is higher and better.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.9) is less and worse than the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (1.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.9% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Child Food Insecurity Rate

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (6.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Food Insecurity Rate

9.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (11.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Severe Housing Problems

16.5%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (16.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

53.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 51.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (49.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

60.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 60.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (61.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 60.4% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (60.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (69.2%).
Prior Value
(69.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

26.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 26.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (26.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 26.6% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (26.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.8%).
Prior Value
(18.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (13.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0%.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Washtenaw People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
74.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (70.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(70.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw High School Graduation

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw High School Graduation

86.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 86.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.1%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (81.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 86.7% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(81.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (86.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 86.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (86.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (86.6%).
Prior Value
(86.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Food Environment Index

8.2
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.2.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.2), Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(7.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.2) is greater and better than the previously measured value (8.1).
Prior Value
(8.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
90.1%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 90.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 90.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (85.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 90.1% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(85.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 90.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (90.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (87.8%).
Prior Value
(87.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.