Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Washtenaw

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Asthma: Medicare Population

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0%.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw COPD: Medicare Population

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens with Asthma

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Teens with Asthma

20.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (24.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 20.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(24.2% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (20.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.5%).
Prior Value
(19.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Chlamydia Incidence Rate

426
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 426 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 266 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 366.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (449), Washtenaw has a value of 426 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(449)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (481.3), Washtenaw has a value of 426 which is lower and better.
US Value
(481.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (426) is less and better than the previously measured value (491).
Prior Value
(491)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

168
Cases per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (234), Washtenaw has a value of 168 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(234)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (206.5), Washtenaw has a value of 168 which is lower and better.
US Value
(206.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (168) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (156).
Prior Value
(156)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw HIV Prevalence Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw HIV Prevalence Rate

186.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (202.6), Washtenaw has a value of 186.2.
MI Value
(202.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (382.2), Washtenaw has a value of 186.2.
US Value
(382.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (186.2) is less  than the previously measured value (189.0).
Prior Value
(189.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults who Smoke

9.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (16.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washtenaw Adults who Used to Smoke

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults who Used to Smoke

20.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (26.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 20.1% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(26.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (20.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens who Smoke: 9th, 11th Graders

Current Value:
1.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (4.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(4.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (1.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.6%).
Prior Value
(2.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens who Used E-cigarettes: 9th, 11th Graders

Current Value:
9.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (20.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(20.8% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.5%).
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults Who Are Obese

27.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (34.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.6% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (27.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults who are Overweight

30.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (33.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 30.1% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 30.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(34.1% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (30.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.2%).
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Children Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Children Who Are Obese

11.8%
% of children ages 2-17 yrs
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (11.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.4%).
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2020 Target (14.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2020 Target
(14.5%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.5%)
<div>The national Healthy People 2030 target is for children and adolescents aged 2-19 years. </div>

County: Washtenaw Teens who are Obese: 9th, 11th Graders

Current Value:
9.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (15.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(15.3% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Frequent Physical Distress

10.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (10.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Insufficient Sleep

33.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 33.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.5%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 33.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (35.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 33.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(35.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 33.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (33.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (36.6%).
Prior Value
(36.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Washtenaw Limited Activity due to a Health Problem

Current Value:
7.9%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (9.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.9% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.8%).
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

8.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washtenaw Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
3.0
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 3.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 3.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (3.6), Washtenaw has a value of 3.0 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3), Washtenaw has a value of 3.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (3.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.8).
Prior Value
(2.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

10.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (16.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (10.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.6%).
Prior Value
(10.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Registered Voters

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Registered Voters

285,272
People
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (285,272) is greater and better than the previously measured value (278,438).
Prior Value
(278,438)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
3.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 3.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.2), Washtenaw has a value of 3.2 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(7.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Washtenaw has a value of 3.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (3.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.3).
Prior Value
(3.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washtenaw Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Violent Crime Rate

303.1
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 303.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 263.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 331.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (443.2), Washtenaw has a value of 303.1 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(443.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (386.5), Washtenaw has a value of 303.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(386.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (303.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (298.9).
Prior Value
(298.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Average Household Size

2.40
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (2.50), Washtenaw has a value of 2.40.
MI Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Washtenaw has a value of 2.40.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Female Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Female Population

50.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (50.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 50.1%.
MI Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 50.1%.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (50.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (50.1%).
Prior Value
(50.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Foreign Born Persons

12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.4%.
MI Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Households

148,704
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Male Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Male Population

49.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (49.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 49.9%.
MI Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 49.9%.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (49.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (49.9%).
Prior Value
(49.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Age 5+ with Language Other than English Spoken at Home

15.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (9.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 15.1%.
MI Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 15.1%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
0.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (0.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.4%.
MI Value
(0.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.4%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (0.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.4%).
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Asian

9.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (3.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.4%.
MI Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.4%.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Black or African American

Current Value:
12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (14.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.4%.
MI Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.4%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (12.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (12.5%).
Prior Value
(12.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Hispanic or Latino

5.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (5.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.3%.
MI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.3%.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (5.3%) is greater  than the previously measured value (5.2%).
Prior Value
(5.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

0.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (0.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.1%.
MI Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.1%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (0.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.1%).
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Over Age 65

15.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (18.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 15.9%.
MI Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 15.9%.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (15.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.5%).
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Over Age 65 (Count)

54,677
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Two or More Races

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Two or More Races

3.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (2.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.8%.
MI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.8%.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (3.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Under Age 18

18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (21.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 18.0%.
MI Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 18.0%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (18.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Under Age 5

4.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (5.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.5%.
MI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (4.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (4.6%).
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population White

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population White

73.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (78.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 73.9%.
MI Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 73.9%.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (73.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (74.0%).
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
69.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (74.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 69.5%.
MI Value
(74.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 69.5%.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (69.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (69.7%).
Prior Value
(69.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Total Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Total Population

365,536
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (365,536) is less  than the previously measured value (366,504).
Prior Value
(366,504)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Veteran Population

4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.3%.
MI Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.3%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
34.5%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 34.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 34.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (30.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 34.5% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(30.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 34.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (34.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.6%).
Prior Value
(30.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Deaths due to Transport Fatal Injuries

Current Value:
23
Deaths
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (23) is less and better than the previously measured value (33).
Prior Value
(33)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Social Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
21.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 21.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 21.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (25.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 21.7% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 21.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw People 65+ Living Alone

26.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (28.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 26.4%.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Current Value:
14,461
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Social Associations

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Social Associations

9.9
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 8.9.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (9.5), Washtenaw has a value of 9.9 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(9.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.1), Washtenaw has a value of 9.9 which is higher and better.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.9) is less and worse than the previously measured value (10.3).
Prior Value
(10.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Substantiated Child Abuse Rate

8.3
Cases per 1,000 children
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (11.7), Washtenaw has a value of 8.3 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.5).
Prior Value
(7.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)

County: Washtenaw Teens who Have an Adult They Trust in Their Neighborhood: 9th, 11th Graders

51.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (51.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens whose Parents Acknowledge when They do a Good Job: 9th, 11th Graders

61.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (61.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (65.9%).
Prior Value
(65.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens whose Teachers Acknowledge when They do a Good Job: 9th, 11th Graders

51.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (51.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (53.1%).
Prior Value
(53.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Households without a Vehicle

8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.1% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Mean Travel Time to Work

23.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 23.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.6.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 23.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (24.5), Washtenaw has a value of 23.6 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(24.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Washtenaw has a value of 23.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
31.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 31.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 31.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (33.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(33.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 31.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (31.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.6%).
Prior Value
(32.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (1.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.9% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Washtenaw Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
63.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 63.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 80.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 63.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (77.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 63.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(77.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 63.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Employment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Employer Establishments

8,150
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8,150) is less  than the previously measured value (8,222).
Prior Value
(8,222)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
60.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 60.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 53.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 60.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (57.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 60.0% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(57.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 60.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
60.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 60.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 53.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 60.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (57.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 60.7% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(57.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 60.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Size of Labor Force

201,121
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (201,121) is less and worse than the previously measured value (201,504).
Prior Value
(201,504)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Total Employment

145,041
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (145,041) is less  than the previously measured value (156,611).
Prior Value
(156,611)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Total Employment Change

-7.4%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of -7.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -4.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of -7.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (-5.8%), Washtenaw has a value of -7.4% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(-5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Washtenaw has a value of -7.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (-7.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-1.6%).
Prior Value
(-1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
2.9%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (4.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 2.9% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(4.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 2.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (2.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.7%).
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults in Family Reduced Food Intake Due to Cost

Current Value:
7.2%
% of adults in family
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Child Food Insecurity Rate

6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (6.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.8%).
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Food Insecurity Rate

9.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (11.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.4%).
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
42.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (43.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 42.2%.
MI Value
(43.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 42.2%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
4,540
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
8.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (16.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.5%).
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Projected Food Insecurity Rate

11.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (14.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (11.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
31.6%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.5%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (49.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (31.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.6%).
Prior Value
(29.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (2.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 2.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw SNAP Benefits Per Capita

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw SNAP Benefits Per Capita

$10.1
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw ($10.1) is less  than the previously measured value ($15.2).
Prior Value
($15.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Homeowner Vacancy Rate

0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.5%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 0.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (1.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Homeownership

58.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 58.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 52.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 58.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (63.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 58.0% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(63.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 58.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Housing Units

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Housing Units

159,296
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (159,296) is greater  than the previously measured value (158,183).
Prior Value
(158,183)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Median Household Gross Rent

$1,335
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of $1,335 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $834 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $924.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value ($1,037), Washtenaw has a value of $1,335 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
($1,037)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Washtenaw has a value of $1,335 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Median Housing Unit Value

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Median Housing Unit Value

$336,300
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of $336,300 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $155,900 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $129,200.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value ($201,100), Washtenaw has a value of $336,300 which is higher and better.
MI Value
($201,100)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($281,900), Washtenaw has a value of $336,300 which is higher and better.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$832
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of $832 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $480 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $537.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value ($565), Washtenaw has a value of $832 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
($565)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Washtenaw has a value of $832 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$2,015
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of $2,015 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,211 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,371.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value ($1,472), Washtenaw has a value of $2,015 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
($1,472)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Washtenaw has a value of $2,015 which is higher and worse.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

26.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 26.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (23.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 26.1% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 26.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (26.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (22.3%).
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Washtenaw Overcrowded Households

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Overcrowded Households

1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 1.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (1.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 1.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

53.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 51.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (49.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Washtenaw Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Severe Housing Problems

16.5%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 16.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.5% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (16.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.3%).
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

60.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 60.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 53.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (61.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 60.4% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(61.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (60.4%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (69.2%).
Prior Value
(69.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

26.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 26.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (26.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 26.6% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (26.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (18.8%).
Prior Value
(18.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Income Inequality

0.489
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 0.489 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.435 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.459.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 0.489 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (0.464), Washtenaw has a value of 0.489 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(0.464)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Washtenaw has a value of 0.489 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Median Household Income

$84,245
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of $84,245 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $59,467 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $54,132.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of $84,245 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value ($68,505), Washtenaw has a value of $84,245 which is higher and better.
MI Value
($68,505)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Washtenaw has a value of $84,245 which is higher and better.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Per Capita Income

$49,568
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of $49,568 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,679 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $29,736.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of $49,568 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value ($37,929), Washtenaw has a value of $49,568 which is higher and better.
MI Value
($37,929)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Washtenaw has a value of $49,568 which is higher and better.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (8.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (13.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0%.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households with Children

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Households with Children

36,610
Households
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (36,610) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36,961).
Prior Value
(36,961)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
3,305
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
74.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (70.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(70.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Washtenaw Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (20.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Youth not in School or Working

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 1.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.6%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 1.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (2.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Child Care Centers

10.2
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 10.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 8.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.3.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (8.9), Washtenaw has a value of 10.2 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(8.9)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Washtenaw has a value of 10.2 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (10.2) is less and worse than the previously measured value (10.5).
Prior Value
(10.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
57.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 57.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 57.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (31.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 57.4% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(31.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 57.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
95.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 95.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 95.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (91.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 95.8% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 95.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Education / School Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Student-to-Teacher Ratio

15.1
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 15.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 15.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (16.7), Washtenaw has a value of 15.1 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Washtenaw has a value of 15.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (15.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.2).
Prior Value
(15.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Education / Student Performance K-12

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw 4th Grade Students Proficient in English/Language Arts

53.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 53.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (44.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 53.6% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(44.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (53.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (54.8%).
Prior Value
(54.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw 8th Grade Students Proficient in Math

Current Value:
47.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 47.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 28.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (37.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 47.8% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (47.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (50.6%).
Prior Value
(50.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw High School Graduation

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw High School Graduation

86.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 86.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.1%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (81.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 86.7% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(81.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (86.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 86.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (86.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (86.6%).
Prior Value
(86.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Air

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Annual Ozone Air Quality

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Annual Ozone Air Quality

3
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Washtenaw has a value of 3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (3) is less and better than the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Annual Particle Pollution

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Annual Particle Pollution

2
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Washtenaw has a value of 2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Current Value:
19,210
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (19,210) is less and better than the previously measured value (33,053).
Prior Value
(33,053)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
90.1%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 90.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 90.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (85.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 90.1% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(85.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 90.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (90.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (87.8%).
Prior Value
(87.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Access to Parks

75.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 75.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (73.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 75.5% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(73.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (75.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (52.2%).
Prior Value
(52.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Food Environment Index

8.2
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.2.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.2), Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(7.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.2) is greater and better than the previously measured value (8.1).
Prior Value
(8.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Liquor Store Density

14.3
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 14.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.5.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 52 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 14.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (15.8), Washtenaw has a value of 14.3 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(15.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7), Washtenaw has a value of 14.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.3).
Prior Value
(14.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Proximity to Highways

6.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.5%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (5.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (6.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.4%).
Prior Value
(6.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Houses Built Prior to 1950

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Houses Built Prior to 1950

16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 16.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 16.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (21.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(21.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw PBT Released

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw PBT Released

1
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

3,122.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 3,122.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3,026.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,144.0.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (3,021.0), Washtenaw has a value of 3,122.0 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(3,021.0)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (3,122.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,165.0).
Prior Value
(3,165.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Number of Extreme Heat Days

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Number of Extreme Heat Days

19
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (19) is less and better than the previously measured value (24).
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Number of Extreme Heat Events

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Number of Extreme Heat Events

15
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (15) is less and better than the previously measured value (21).
Prior Value
(21)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Current Value:
29
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (29) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (27).
Prior Value
(27)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
14
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.